Congress MP Mallu Ravi has raised concerns about the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in Delhi, saying the Supreme Court had given a judgment indicating a problem with the process.

Ravi made the remarks in Hyderabad, Telangana. He cited figures of around 36 or 35 lakh voters being deleted and 34 or 35 lakh voters being issued notices.

What Mallu Ravi said

According to the reported remarks, Ravi linked the figures to his argument about the impact of the Delhi SIR exercise. His statement, as reported, ends before he completes the explanation of what he believes the numbers show.

The report does not provide the text of the Supreme Court judgment, the date of that judgment or details of the specific issue identified by the court. It also does not clarify which of the alternative figures cited by Ravi is correct.

Why the figures matter

The remarks place voter deletions and notices at the centre of the concern raised by the Congress MP. However, the reported material does not include an official response from the Election Commission, details of the affected voters or the procedure followed after notices were issued.

The comments were reported on September 23, 2026. No further verified details about the next legal, electoral or administrative step are included.

Conclusion

Mallu Ravi has questioned the Delhi SIR process by citing the Supreme Court and disputed voter-related figures. The full court reasoning, confirmed totals and official responses remain unspecified in the reported material.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q. What is the issue raised by Mallu Ravi?

He raised concerns about the Special Intensive Revision in Delhi and referred to a Supreme Court judgment.

Q. How many voters did Ravi say were deleted?

He cited a figure of around 36 or 35 lakh deleted voters.

Q. How many voters were reportedly issued notices?

Ravi cited 34 or 35 lakh voters as having been issued notices.

Q. Where did Mallu Ravi make the remarks?

The remarks were reported from Hyderabad, Telangana.

Q. When were the remarks reported?

They were reported on September 23, 2026.

Q. Is the full Supreme Court judgment available in the report?

The reported material does not include the judgment text or its detailed reasoning.

Q. Is there an official response to the claims?

No official response is included in the reported material.